Bleeping Bull wants to kill the Constitution

Infowars reports shrill progressive Masshole Senator Elizabeth Warren wants penalties for so-called “disinformation.”  But the site reports that could lead to the end of the First Amendment and with it perhaps, the entire US Constitution as well.

Warren says she would hold social media platforms liable for not policing content intended to mislead possible voters by telling them incorrect voting times and that they could vote via text message.

In addition, Warren also wants to criminalize other speech deemed “disinformation.”

“I will push for new laws that impose tough civil and criminal penalties for knowingly disseminating this kind of information, which has the explicit purpose of undermining the basic right to vote,” Warren said in a release. “The Trump administration eliminated this critical position [the cybersecurity coordinator at the National Security Council], weakening our defenses against cybersecurity threats and disinformation.”

“As president, I will reinstate the position and empower the coordinator so that our country is safe.”

 

But here is a reality check, there are already such laws on the books.  And if one should  read the entire press release, so-called ‘voter disfranchisement’ isn’t really Warren’s true intent:

One expert estimated that during the 2016 election, there was a “one-to-one ratio of junk news to professional news” shared on Twitter. Despite Mark Zuckerberg’s insistence that it was “crazy” to think that false news had influenced the 2016 election’s outcome, the company later admitted that “malicious actors” had engaged in disinformation campaigns on the site leading up to the 2016 election, including using inauthentic accounts to promote false news stories and direct people toward stolen data.

 

In essence her actions would lead to something akin to the BBC in England or the CBC in Canada, government-run and sanctioned outlets

If anyone has any sense of the Constitution, this proposal would totally violate the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

And since news gathering and reporting is an activity; not an identity, it should not be the government’s role in defining who press is.

Project Veritas founder and real undercover journalist James O’Keefe said

“Establishment journalists, however, cling to their identity as journalists.  Their friends in government have gone so far as to initiate legislation to protect that status.”

 

What O’Keefe refers to are proposed media shield laws which pop up in Congress every few years which would allow the government to define who is and isn’t a journalist by offering legal protections to government-sanctioned journalists which are not offered to anyone else engaged in news gathering.

And this may also apply to Peter Schweizer who wrote about Warren and other globalist progressives in his new book Profiles in Corruption.

Breitbart reports Warren’s daughter piggybacked off her mother to cash in on some major corporate elite contracts.

In fact this took place during the infamous Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) from years ago.

Amelia, alongside business partner Jody Greenstone Miller, founded the Business Talent Group (BTG) in 2007, “a temp firm for specialized and highly skilled employees.” The business played a role in what has been dubbed the “gig economy,” centralized around independent contractors and part-time workers. In other words, “people are hired for part-time jobs rather than full-time employment” — something Warren has railed against.

BTG did not have a smooth start. As Profiles in Corruption points out, temp businesses are “largely about corporate connections” — connections which exploded after Warren landed her job as the chair of the TARP oversight committee, which “played a central role in the federal government’s bailout of financial firms”

 

So now tell me again, leftists and especially those in leftist cities in Massachusetts, how she has the stuff to be President?

 

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: