Stuart Rhodes, founder of Oathkeepers responds swiftly and seriously to Obama/Soetoro’s executive order speech on the ILLEGAL ALIENS (for my brethren in the corporate media) he just certified.

Obama’s declaration of intent to rule by decree and grant “amnesty” to millions of illegal aliens is an impeachable offense, and Obama should be impeached and removed from office.  This is a good test to see if the Republicans have the courage of their claimed convictions.  If they don’t impeach him for this, then they will lose all credibility, and throw us into a TRUE constitutional crisis, because they will have failed to do their jobs, leaving the people with the necessity of pursuing “other options” to stop him.

And this is not about race.  I am 1/4 Mexican, and come from a family of migrant farm workers in California, on my mother’s side.  My mother and uncle grew up picking grapes, and even while I was in the Army my Grandparents still worked the fields.  My Great Grandparents came here, legally, to have a better life, and they and their decedents worked hard to attain that better life (working their way out of the fields).

And others are welcome to come here and do the same, but they must do so legally, and Congress has ALREADY established the laws and rules for immigration, and until Congress changes those laws and rules, it is the duty of the President to execute them, not obstruct them, or attempt to rule by decree in direct violation of the law.

This is about the preservation of our Republic, and our republican form of government, which the Constitution mandates that the Federal government must guarantee to each state.  And by violating the law of the land, and violating our right to a republican form of government, and by refusing to protect us from illegal invasion, Obama has violated his oath, grossly, and is unfit for office.

BOLD…Stuart, if that were the case, he would be arrested for not being a Natural Born Citizen (Article 2, Section1, Clause 5), and all of Congress would be arrested as accessories before and after the fact.  But the banksters and the New World Order elites have used their money to buy our justice system and corrupt us.

FURTHER…and if this ever got out, the globalist feminist movement, who is all about control rather than female empowerment, would shave off what little hair they have at the underarms!

Obama’s message is much like an abusive wife-beater who tells his wife, while beating her, “this is your fault, bitch!  I wouldn’t have to do this if you acted right, and if you want it to stop, YOU’D BETTER DO WHAT I WANT, OR I WILL CONTINUE TO BEAT YOU.”   Obama is telling Congress that Congress is his “bitch” to abuse as he sees fit, and they need to shape up and do what he wants.   Pass the legislation he wants, or he will do what he wants anyway, by executive fiat decree, until Congress does pass the legislation he wants.  So much for separation of powers.   So much for the Constitution.  So much for a Republican victory.   He will rule as if his party had won control of both houses of Congress and had actually passed legislation he likes.  He will rule as if Congress doesn’t even exist.   He will rule as if the Constitution doesn’t even exist, and as if he were an absolute and unrestrained dictator.   He thinks that when he opens his mouth, “law” comes out.  That is what a dictatorship is.   Obama condemned just this kind of action by his predecessor, but now the “legal scholar” has conveniently forgotten what he knew about separation of powers and the clear enumerated powers of Congress, or the duties of a president.

Rhodes is in the right to call this rule of Obama a dictatorship. But one that must be removed by HIS GROUP THE OATHKEEPERS BECAUSE GOING THROUGH CONGRESS AND THE COURTS HAS BEEN MET WITH TOTAL MAO TSE TUNG STYLE RESISTANCE!


If there were to be major riots (SHTF) and you as a soldier were asked to point a gun at fellow citizens and kill them…WOULD YOU DO IT?

A “yes” answer means you were taught by your superiors to hate this republic (and that’s what this nation is supposed to be and NOT A DEMOCRACY!) its founding fathers and all the documents it stands for namely The US Constitution. To put it another way…VIOLATION OF POSSE COMITATUS.

A “no” answer means you have lived up to your oath to The Constitution and not to anyone or anything else and…WELCOME TO THE REVOLUTION AGAINST THE BANKSTERS AND THE POWER ELITE!

I believe our troops should be sent to the border…removed from all illegal war occupations from other places in the world, and yes that includes the Ebola hot zone as Rhodes explains…

Instead of sending the troops to Africa to expose them to Ebola, why doesn’t he place them on the border with Mexico and secure us from invasion by the violent cartels (who are taking over ranches and entire towns on the U.S. side, just as they have done on the Mexican side), and secure us from documented infiltration by ISIS terrorists who come across freely?   He has intentionally left us vulnerable to those invasions, and to that violence, and he does all in his power to limit, curtail, and suppress our own ability to defend ourselves, while tracking us and using unprecedented surveillance on us, in a clear indication that he considers We the People the future military enemy of he and his fellow oath-breakers (and in particular, us military veterans, who are targeted for disarmament through trumped up “determinations” by the very Veterans Administration that is supposed to help us, not disarm us).

However, Stuart, you should read this article by Devvy Kidd, who is I think and even STRONGER oathkeeper than you are, saying Obama CAN NOT BE IMPEACHED.

Those who demand his impeachment are asking to set one of the worst legal precedents in our history: Any constitutionally ineligible thug can come along and buy his way into the White House. We’ll just impeach him later!

To impeach would also accomplish this: Every piece of legislation he’s signed into law would remain on the books.

She then quotes REAL Constitutional expert (no due respect to liberal professor Jonathan Turley) Dr. Edwin Vieira…

“Perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to a usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

Besides removing a usurper from office, that should be our second-highest consideration and why the outlaw Congress hasn’t moved against him. All 535 of them allowed this to happen, and now it’s gone so far; they don’t have the courage to take on the mess they’ve made.

The usurper can be indicted once out of office, but how to get him out? Please take the time to read my column on that process. Will he ever be indicted for his crimes? With enough public pressure, it can happen because his handlers would simply throw him under the bus as a liability.

By the way, back to you Stuart one of your fellow oathkeepers, Ralph which I think amounts to a calling out…OF YOU.

When are we (oathkeepers) going to do something? We have a lawless government and that is inclusive of congress. We have allowed the government to get away with so much that we on the verge of giving our country away without a fight. We are being invaded and our federal government is helping the enemy. That is treason. The main thing the federal government is supposed to do is secure our borders. They have flung them open and sued the states using criminal judges who don’t support the law to beat us back and enough is enough. Are we going to fight to protect our country or not?
Well at least someone, I think is doing something about it.  If ever there was a time for Sheriff Joe Arpaio to take action in all this, and also with his Cold Case Posse and Mike Zullo, this would be the time!
Bob Unruh with WND reports…

Less than two hours after Barack Obama announced a solo move to protect millions of illegal aliens from deportation, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio took him to court to have the Constitution upheld.

A lawsuit filed by attorney Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch named Obama and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Immigration Services chief Leon Rodriquez and Attorney General Eric Holder as defendants in an action that seeks to avoid “irreversible harm” from Obama’s actions because they will “encourage[e] more illegal aliens to enter the country unlawfully…”

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, seeks, among other things, a “permanent injunction declaring the amnesty programs to be unlawful.”

Arpaio, who has been at odds with the Obama administration a number of times, released a statement:

“This unconstitutional act by the president will have a serious detrimental impact on my carrying out the duties and responsibilities for which I am encharged as sheriff,” he said “Specifically, it will severely strain our resources, both in manpower and financially, necessary to protect the citizens I was elected to serve. For instance, among the many negative [e]ffects of this executive order, will be the increased release of criminal aliens back onto streets of Maricopa County, Arizona, and the rest of the nation.”

He continued, “I am not seeking to myself enforce the immigration laws as this is the province of the federal government. Rather, I am seeking to have the president and the other defendants obey the U.S. Constitution, which prevents this executive order from having been issued in the first place. This unconstitutional act must be enjoined by a court of law on behalf of not just myself, but all of the American people.”

Klayman, a former federal prosecutor and founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, recently obtained a preliminary injunction against the National Security Agency for having unconstitutionally accessed the telephonic metadata of nearly all Americans. That case is pending at the appellate level now.



Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: