Quick Hits

The subject…ELIGIBILITY!

Obama eligibility case lives! – Supreme Court’s own precedent cited in new demand for resolution

 

Judges have ruled Obama’s eligibility is a political question that is not for the courts to decide. They have argued the plaintiffs didn’t have “standing,” the requirement that they have sustained or will sustain direct injury or harm that can be redressed by a court.

Now, however, a plaintiff has surfaced who claims he has suffered a specific and individual injury – the $90 he is seeking to have returned by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.The president’s eligibility is being questioned in a friend-of-the-court brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court by the constitutional experts at William J. Olson, P.C. and the United States Justice Foundation.

They are asking the high court to take up the case of Christopher John Rudy, a registered patent attorney who paid to the Patent and Trademark Office “fee increases” totaling $90 under the America Invents Act, “purportedly enacted into law in September 2011 by Congress and the president.”

 

Justice Clarence Thomas: We’re ‘evading’ eligibility

NO YOU AIN’T!

New Black Panther Leader Hashim Nzinga: ‘Like It or Not Obama is from Kenya’

Obama turned 53 – or did he?

From 2010…Obama birth certificate issue more urgent than ever

IRS and Barack’s Half-Brother 
 
Advertisements

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: