About Ron Paul supporters getting screwed in the land of 10,000 Lakes, heroes like Jesse Ventura and neo-left-right idiots like Pawlenty, Bachmann, Ellison, Coleman and Franken, it seems as if Minnesota’s neocons have a beef with Ron Paul supporters.

A blogger with US News press reports


I was assisting with the organizing of one of the most hostile, anti-Ron Paul, Republican county Conventions in the State of Minnesota. Here are some of the high points of the convention with video included.

They had scheduled the venue, a local government middle school, until 5pm and of course had to pay extra for using the space longer. The convention convened at 9am, and didn’t adjourn until 10:15p that night.

Although they tried to immediately pass a rule prohibiting videotaping, it was out of order thus null and void. It’s a public meeting that was not in what’s called “Executive Session” meaning that recording is indeed allowed. They did ask the observers in the back of the room who had cameras on tripods at the beginning of the day to leave and unfortunately they complied. Several people did try and remove me from the room too!

They did all sorts of other things to attempt to stack the deck in their favor too.

First of all, because of redistricting, they had to create an entirely new organization. Therefore all officers had to be elected, bylaws had to be adopted, and the rules for the convention had to be approved by everyone at the convention. That’s a long process. But they wanted to keep much of the previous organization intact along with the old mentality of “it’s the way we’ve been doing it and we will continue doing it this way”. Most of the rules favored the establishment and were essentially an incumbent protection plan for those who held power in the district prior to redistricting. This is a very heavy Romney area and they didn’t want their club overrun with new people who weren’t obedient to their political caste system.

There were several mechanisms in the rules and bylaws we were trying to get changed to remove their built-in advantage. Without going into great detail when it came time to vote for delegates to the Congressional District and State Convention about 50 people got in line behind the mic to nominate themselves. The establishment had posted a list on the screen of delegates who they wanted to be nominated (all establishment people) and called for a vote on it. We interjected (I instructed our people to hover around the mic) and Ron Paul supporters started trying to nominate themselves. The establishment fought that, and then someone moved to close nominations. The Chair was going to take a vote on closing nominations but that was out of order. I had a copy of RRO in my hand and was coaching the Ron Paul delegates who were willing to be vocal on fighting this. I explained to them exactly what to say since I wasn’t allowed to speak aloud to the convention or address the Chair; this part is in the video.

At this point the room went berserk as Ron Paul delegates (and many Santorum supporters I suspect) were livid that the establishment was trying to ram through their slate of delegates without allowing any other nominations.The Chair got into a yelling match with our people over the PA system because he initially refused to follow the rules and this was the only way to stop him or at least slow him down enough to force proper parliamentary procedure to be followed. For a few seconds I thought we were about to have a riot in the audience as the Romney / establishment crowd was yelling against our people en masse.

RRO clearly states that a call to close floor nominations was out of order if individuals were still attempting to nominate themselves (about 50 people still were). The Chair and parliamentarian didn’t seem to care, or know RRO, and they didn’t seem inclined to be bothered to look it up either until effectively forced to do so by us. This is also in the video.

We weren’t winning the argument that a move to close floor nominations was out of order at that time so I instructed our guy at the mic to drop the subject and allow for the vote, because RRO requires a 2/3rd majority in order to close floor nominations and I was confident the establishment didn’t have those numbers. And I told him that even if they did have 2/3rd, then we could appeal the motion anyway because it was in clear violation of RRO and effectively out of order thus making it null and void. So the Chair called for a vote for closing floor nominations after only 1 person had been nominated. A vote was taken, the Chair tried to sneak it through by saying the “ayes have it” which was an outright lie. Our people screamed “DIVISION” at the top of their lungs and forced a standing count. Then the Chair tried to say “the ayes had it” after the count even though it was a simple majority not reaching the required 2/3rd amount of votes. The way I understand it they were 1 vote short of attaining the required 2/3rd votes necessary to close nominations. We had to point out to the chair AGAIN that it was 2/3 required to close nominations from the floor because he was going to try and pretend that it only requires 50% which it doesn’t. The video documents this part very clearly.


Bold–there’s that word from GA again.


I am a 9/11 Truther, Birther, Tenther and Bircher


Being in denial is being complicit with the crime.  THAT GOES FOR ALL YOU NEOCONS OUT THERE (Debbie Schlussel, Pamela Gellar, all you stinking Israel firsters.


The NYPD’s new program was supposed to ‘keep the city safe from terrorism’ and ended up in what quite a few Muslims have been targeted by information about where they shop and businesses they own. Lots of people are starting to look at the program and say in many cases what’s going on is entrapment – trying to get people to take part in or help plan things to in turn to arrest them. Opinion differ among the Big Apple citizens. Cyrus McGoldrick, Civil Rights manager fro the Council on American-Islamic relations brings his take on the matter.




Quick Hits

Media blackout on Obama eligibility near-total


Government Employees: The True 1 Percent


P.E.R.S. – Oregon’s Grand Delusion


Union Pension Funds, the States and Financial Ruin


Special Series: Local Governments Face Bankruptcy Quandary


Devvy Kidd–Veterans about to get shafted by the illegitimate president


Sen. Schumer Exploits Trayvon Martin Case in Call to Outlaw “Stand Your Ground”


ALLEGED Killer of Florida teen told police he was attacked first


Everything Is Spying On You


Justice Kagan and Obamacare: She Needs to Recuse Herself Immediately


Ron Paul Suspects Supreme Court Will Rule “Monstrosity” Obamacare Constitutional


Exposed: Concerted Effort by Establishment to Steal Ron Paul’s Delegates


For The Record: Rockefeller Soft Kill Depopulation Plans Exposed


Judge Napolitano Answers: Why Is the Supreme Court Ruling on the Constitutionality of Health Care Now?


American Idiots

It was inevitable I would say this about my country, but WE HAVE BECOME A NATION OF IDIOTS…as shown in the video below…



And you can now add the censors at Forbes magazine to the list of idiots in the media.  It’s clear and obvious the media blackout and coverup continues.  Here is a portion of the Forbes article before the bankster censors got to it.


There is something very wrong when the sitting president refuses to divulge huge pieces of information about his background. What is he hiding? Maybe the “birthers” were a little extreme, but is there something wrong with this “manufactured candidate,” whose history remains sealed from public view? What is he hiding?

Could the “Hawaii birth certificate” be a forgery? Is there something much worse—like “sponsorship” by an unnamed special interest? I don’t know. I do know that the man in the White House now is an imposter. The only question is which kind of an imposter: an incompetent “pretender” or a genuine phony, a “Manchurian candidate,” who is a liberal, ½ black and ½ white, and an obvious Muslim sympathizer (despite claims of being a Christian—in clear conflict with his non-Christian behavior).

Will this campaign expose him as the imposter, and the pretender his behavior has revealed? Will it expose his hidden history and murky background. We know about his failures and mistakes.

For those who don’t, here is another in this series of revealing excerpts from HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY: Leadership Lessons from the Obama Presidency. The book is now available on in paperback and Kindle versions. Other in e-book versions are available at

Excerpt from the chapter: Beware the Pretender:
…”No matter how many times President Obama refers to the “problems he inherited,” he has now been in office three years. Certainly many of the current problems can be traced back to events that happened during the eight years that Bush held the top office, and some can be traced back to even earlier presidencies—but far from all of them.

Many of the problems are newly created (or made worse), and Barack Obama owns them. Candidate Obama stepped up and essentially said, “I want the job, and everything that comes with it” by running for president. After three years in office, the problems now belong to him and his presidency. He caused them, made them worse, or didn’t solve them. Either way, they are his now.
…In leadership, you cannot “pretend” to be a leader. You either are—or you aren’t—a leader. One or the other will become apparent very quickly.

If you want the leadership job, you must step up and take full ownership of it. A “pretender” or “poser” is like an actor who has learned all the right lines, but has no idea what they mean. Once the script has been followed (or deviated from), the actor is clueless about what to do next. This is the job of the leader. Unfortunately, in this government, the “directors” often seem clueless, having learned in academia where results and wins/losses are theoretical, or in politics where success (at getting elected) is more a matter of rhetoric than results.
If you are not ready for a position, or do not believe that you have what it takes to rise to the challenge (or clean up the mess even if you believe it is not your mess), then do not take the job. This was Barack Obama’s fundamental mistake. He grossly underestimated the difficulty of the position he was running for, and overestimated his preparedness to actually do the job. Just because he could “talk a good game” (thanks to a phalanx of speech writers and the omnipresent teleprompters) does not mean he actually knew what to do or how to do it. The presidency of the United States of America is not a place for heavy OJT (On-the Job-Training)….”

After the first three plus years of the presidency, it is painfully clear that Barack Obama was a “pretty face,” and “glib speaker” and a lightweight liberal politician with a community organizer/radical background. The American people should be outraged at this man’s behavior and even his candidacy. Why are they not? Because of the misinformation delivered by sympathetic liberal/mainstream media who loves his nonsensical form of governing.
…”Obama’s perceived preparedness for the presidency is a terrible delusion, from which it is difficult to escape. Mistakes build upon each other and result in even more complex problems. Difficult problems that are mishandled become even more difficult to fix. When you have too little experience, lack substance (other than the words of your latest speech), then leading, managing and problem solving simply don’t happen. And that is what has occurred. When you compound the problem by surrounding your self with like-minded theorists, lacking in real-world experience, things become worse yet. The theoretical solutions to problems often don’t work due to the messiness of the real world—and the reasons are almost unfathomable to these rookie executive/politicians. …”
What should Americans think about this “imposter?” Will he divulge his true background so we can all see who he is and where he came from—really? If not, is this just a man who should never have been sworn into the office of President in the first place, and who has crippled Americans miserably during his term?


H/T again to Birther Report as well as to Rob, Free Republic, and Courage in America.

Sheriff Joe to Barry…

You want a war?  YOU GOT ONE…LET’S RUMBLE!






Another dumb politician

And no surprise it’s one from California, it is RINO ANTI-CONSTITUTIONALIST CONGRESSMAN DAN LUNGREN.  This time, the neocon dope was challenged by Mara Zebest, who asked him a few pointed questions at a recent meeting.  Two YouTube videos cam as a result.






Here is some of what she posted (h/t Birther Report)


I confronted congressman (Lungren) at two town halls he scheduled this past week – one at Citrus Heights on Tuesday (March 13, 2012)… and the second was at Rancho Cordova on Thursday (March 15, 2012). The congressman has this new format in which there is an open mic… meaning anyone can come up and voice their comments, questions, or concerns… as long as they do not exceed a 5-minute time limit. That part of the format I like… but the part that should be modified… is to have the 5-minutes interactive with the Congressman. The idea should be to have a dialogue with constituents rather than the current rules of two separate monologues in which the Congressman gets the last word.

With the current rules… Lungren listens to all the comments… takes notes… everyone takes turns at the mic… and after everyone speaks… after Lungren has had time to think about what he wants to say in response… he then gives his response and there’s NO reactions allowed at this point. At both town halls — I had plenty to say to counter Lungren’s remarks on the eligibility issue but couldn’t counter due to the rules for the open mic format — which is why it would have been great to be interactive immediately for the 5-minute time limit.

So at the first town hall… I get up and discuss a few concerns which included the findings of Sheriff Arpaio. I explain to the audience that the Selective Service card is fraudulent which means – by law – Obama is not entitled to hold any public office. I continue to say that Arpaio presented compelling evidence and I encouraged everyone to do a search for the press conference and see the evidence directly… and then asked Lungren “When will there be a congressional investigation?”

When Lungren addressed my eligibility concerns of the night… he says (paraphrasing what is shown in the video), “On the eligibility issue… I believe the President was born in Hawaii. I had a private conversation with the Governor of Hawaii in which she told me that she saw his birth certificate. And keep in mind this is a Republican Governor… so I believe what she told me.” Notice he also got a plug in that she was running for Senator which may account for why he referenced a previous Governor rather than the current Governor.

Recall, I couldn’t respond immediately that night.

So now that I had him on record of his response, I go to the second town hall on March 17, 2012. I go up to the mic and explain that I was at the previous town hall in which I expressed concern over Obama’s eligibility (in light of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s recent press release information). I repeat the same points and then continued to say [paraphrasing]:

“Your [Lungren’s] response was to tell me that you talked with a Governor who said she saw the document. I have several problems with that response. First, that was the previous Governor, and according to Hawaiian law, it is illegal for the Governor to see the document, so why would she be allowed to see it? The current Governor said he would put the issue to rest and later confessed he could not find any document on file. But assuming Governor Lingle at her word… that she saw the document…. is Governor Lingle a document forensic expert? Because Arpaio is an official law enforcement agency and has had FORENSIC EXPERTS examine the documents presented by the White House and there is no doubt for the Posse investigators that the documents put forth by Obama are forgeries. And to your [Lungren’s] point in which you emphasized that the Governor was a Republican… the subtle implication being that she wouldn’t lie by the mere nature of her political registration… IF we are going to use ‘being a Republican’ as our metric for truth… then I would like to point out to you that Sheriff Joe Arpaio is also a Republican. So when will you start to evaluate the compelling evidence he has presented? When will there be a congressional hearing?”

Everyone in the room applauded my little speech… I got more applause than I did the previous town hall night and even received high fives from audience members while returning to my seat. Another person jumped up to get into line after I sat down (he later told me that when he heard me speak on the topic… I gave him courage to do the same). The video for this Rancho Cordova town hall doesn’t include the open mic footage… maybe the fact that more than one person asked about eligibility is the reason (Lungren may not want that portion to be seen… only his responses).



Has the holy grail been found?

Somebody better alert Monty Python, for something big, not different has been found, at least according to The Daily Pen.


A government document found buried in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive bolsters a growing mountain of evidentiary data against Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president. The document indicates a consular officer issued a single certificate of statutory citizenship, within the time frame including August 4, 1961, to a child born to a U.S. citizen between July 1st and December 31st, 1961 in the Kenyan region of Africa. The record also reveals that the certificate was the only one issued for this specific type of arrival in the U.S. over a span of more than 18 months, among thousands from other parts of the world.

A recently discovered rare immigration record found by researchers working on behalf of an ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency reveals that an American consular officer issued a single Certificate of Citizenship to only one passenger arriving in the U.S. from the Kenyan region of Africa between July and December of 1961.

The record shows demographic and status classifications for a passenger who was explicitly recorded at the INS Arrival Inspection Station as an individual being born to a U.S. citizen parent arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st and December 31st, 1961.

This information and the dates of its documentation are disturbing given the rare nature of the issuance of certificates of citizenship for children who acquire their citizenship by birth to incoming U.S. citizens in this particular region of Africa.


If I had my druthers

You would see the following instead of…


Fake corporate cable news

Jersey Shore on anything on the music video channels

Trashy talk shows and courtroom shows

Those god-awful Kardashians






Tired of all the games?




Ever hear of Rule 40?  Dig this.

The latest effort to kill enthusiasm for Ron Paul is to remind people of Rule 40(b) of the 2008 GOP rules regarding open convention and delegates. What they fail to realize is the public is aware that Ron Paul is being robbed of wins and we also know he has more than the 50 delegates that the MSM is reporting. Freedom marches on!