CALLING ALL BIRCHERS

To those who follow and like The John Birch Society like me, CEO Art Thompson discusses how the US Government and Council on Foreign Relations are using similar tactics as were used in the past in dealing with conflicts across the world.

What part does he not get…

Of the term AT YOUR OWN PERIL?!  Making reference to not just Obama/Soetoro/Soeharkah/Bonnel, but his team of slimeball globalists called lawyers who are ignoring the ruling by Judge Malihi Thursday in Atlanta.

 

A motion to quash a subpoena issued to Obama to attend the hearing was rejected by the judge, who did not find merit in arguments that the subpoena would require the President “to interrupt duties as President of the United States” and that the subpoena is, “on its face, unreasonable.” Specifically, Judge Malihi wrote: “Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend [and] has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that [his] testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary.’… Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to quash is denied.”

The hearing was held anyway with lawyers presenting their cases against Obama, the Defendant. American Thinker writers Cindy Simpson and Alan Halbert noted:

Under Georgia law, the Secretary of State had properly deferred the ballot challenges to the OSAH [Office of State Administrative Hearings] for the court’s opinion, and the determination of whether or not Obama’s name will appear on the Georgia ballot ultimately rests with the Secretary.

The judge could end the matter with a ruling of a default judgment against the President. Or he could direct the Secretary to declare the President ineligible to run as a candidate for the presidency. Whatever the outcome, the American Thinker writers claim that by his ignoring the subpoena, “Obama has openly shown his disregard for the laws of that state.” This opinion was shared by Van Irion, the LLF attorney bringing the case against the president:

[He has] decided that he is above the Courts, the law, and the Constitution. He has just indicated … that he is not subject to their authority. This is the true story from today.

 

In other words, DOING WHAT ALINSKY, SOROS ET AL TOLD HIM TO DO!  HE IS TO BE ARRESTED IMMEDIATELY!

Update on the GA hearing

Sher Zieve has posted at a site new to me called Web Commentary an update on the recent GA eligibility hearing.

 

There seems to be some confusion regarding what happened after the 26 January Obama-eligibility Georgia ballot hearings conducted in Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi’s court. Part of the reason for the confusion may be that a seeming mountain of evidence was presented in Sand to the court, along with answers given by expert witnesses as to Mr. Obama’s original and current ineligibility to hold the Office of President of the United States.

Currently, articles claiming that Obama’s name has, already, been disallowed from appearing as a presidential candidate on the Georgia ballot are inaccurate. What has, thus far, occurred are the following.

1. During the 26 January hearing, three attorneys (including Atty. Orly Taitz who was the primary attorney and instrumental in bringing this case to the court) brought witnesses and evidence before Judge Malihi’s court strongly suggesting Mr. Obama does not meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the Office of President of the United States of America

2. Prior to the hearing, all three attorneys met with Judge Malihi in his chambers

3. After the hearing was concluded, Judge Malihi asked all pleading attorneys to present summaries of their cases to him by 5 February

I spoke with Attorney Taitz on Saturday 28 January and she indicated that Judge Malihi has expedited his recommendation/ruling and has reset the date of attorney submissions to 1 February. She also indicated that multiple viewing courtrooms were packed during the hearing and that at least twenty Security Guards were present. Judge Malihi advised he hopes to submit his recommendation to Secretary of State Brian Kemp–as to whether or not Mr. Obama is qualified to appear on the State of Georgia’s ballot as a presidential candidate–as quickly as possible.

 

Now to no one’s surprise the following has taken place re: Thugocracy, Inc.

 

Many judges and their families appear to have been under multiple threats from the Obama administration, if they failed to follow through with Mr. Obama‘s orders. As an additional side note, a recent investigation uncovered numerous threats to Glenn Beck’s staff from one of Mr. Obama’s mentors and frequent Obama White House visitor multi-billionaire George Soros. Even after Beck left Fox News to pursue his own Internet network and other ventures, President of America’s Survival, Inc. (ASI), a public policy organization, Cliff Kincaid reports the Soros people are still after Beck for exposing the Soros and Soros-Obama schemes to destroy our country. Recently, Beck’s staff has come under fire from the Soros syndicate and the life of at least one investigative reporter on Beck’s staff and her child have been threatened.

These “New World Order” people play for keeps and will apparently do anything and everything to shut down any and all truth in their determination–as Soros alludes to–to rule the world. We can only pray that Judge Malihi and the State of Georgia will remain strong and courageous in their efforts to uphold the truth. Please remember: “If we refuse to rise up and fight, we’ll be forced to lie down and die.”

 

Which leads me to wonder if Glenn Beck was the talk radio host implied in a Canada Free Press article by Judi McLeod and Doug Haggman from August 2009.  In it the following picture is displayed…

 

 

The Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press are in possession of extremely sensitive investigative documents, including a stunning written admission by a nationally known talk show host stating that he was threatened with his career – or worse – should he talk about the issue of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth records to a national audience. This document was obtained on December 10, 2008, and provides explicit detail of a “gag order” imposed on this host before and immediately following the national election last November.

After receiving and authenticating the document, US based veteran private investigator Douglas J. Hagmann opened a full scale investigation into the media blackout, with specific emphasis on tracing the blackout origins to those issuing them. This investigation was conducted in conjunction with Judi McLeod, founding editor of Canada Free Press and Brian Thompson, CFP Information Technology chief following a meeting near Toronto, Ontario last December. At that meeting, it was decided to keep the existence of the document secret until additional evidence could be obtained.

 

That leads me to wonder Beck had to have been the one who was given the corporate gag from his then bosses at CNN or even Fox News, including CFR members Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdoch along with Saudi oil robber baron Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talaal.

 

Don’t mess with Sheriff Joe

One person learned the hard way you don’t threaten someone like Joe Arpaio.  KTAR Radio in Phoenix reports

 

Deputies in Knoxville, Tennessee worked with Maricopa County Sheriff’s deputies to serve a search warrant and seize a computer and other evidence from the home of Adam Eugene Cox.

The investigation into an internet death threat started in October, and Cox was arrested Friday on an unrelated warrant for assault. He is now being investigated in the internet death threat of MCSO Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his family. Deputies obtained a search warrant at Google, where they were then connected to Cox.

His threat reads in part: I plan to kill Arpaio first. He will be filled with a thousand bullet holes before the year is out. I promise you this. He won’t f**k with Obama. He will be buried 10 feet under and his whole family will be murdered along with him.

 

And for the coup de grace

The threat comes in response to the Sheriff’s office’s investigation into the legitimacy of Obama’s birth certificate. Cox’s mother confirmed with police that he is an avid supporter of president Obama and police say he has a history of assault.

 

See what happens when you become an obot, MR COX?

 

Also joining in the battle was Birther Report.

 

Back in October of 2011 an Obot left numerous comments at this blog threatening to kill various people that have pursued Obama’s ineligibility to be president.  Right after that comment was submitted we grabbed the IP address from the commenter and the location was in Tennessee. We then sent the pertinent information and the actual death threat to Dr. [Jerome] Corsi, among others, and informed them we were not 100% certain that was the commenter but we were pretty sure it was and it could be easily verified by contacting Blogger owner Google to confirm. Dr. Corsi later informed us that Sheriff Joe’s office was now investigating the death threat.

 

Other media reports on this…

 

VIDEO: Deputies go to Google to ID blogger behind Arpaio threats
http://www.azfamily.com/news/local/Deputies-go-to-Google-to-ID-blogger-behind-Arpaio-death-threats-137677118.html

AZ Sheriff: TN man threatened to kill him because of Obama investigation
http://www.wbir.com/news/article/202819/2/AZ-sheriff-TN-man-threatened-to-kill-him-because-of-Obama-investigation

TN man arrested in death threat against Sheriff Arpaio
http://www.kpho.com/story/16619194/man-arrested-in-sheriff-arpaio-death-threat

MCSO: Obama fanatic threatened to kill Arpaio
http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/local/phoenix/mcso-obama-fanatic-threatened-to-kill-arpaio-01272012

TN man arrested in death threat against Sheriff Arpaio
http://phoenix-on.us/2012/01/27/tn-man-arrested-in-death-threat-against-sheriff-arpaio

 

 

Your daily dose of The Judge

OR…How the feds get around the Constitution

BREAKING! OBAMA GETS GOT!

From Give Us Liberty…

 

I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama’s name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed. 

How does the mainstream media spin this? 

The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge’s recommendation. That means that Obama will not  get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia! 
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!

 

To answer the second question, it depends on what the Pentagon/CIA/Ivory Towers tell the news directors what to say/do.

Well, all except perhaps WND.

 

Georgia residents today delivered sworn testimony to a court that Barack Obama is slam-dunk disqualified from having his name on the 2012 presidential ballot in the state because his father never was a U.S. citizen, so he forever is prevented from qualifying as a “natural born citizen” as the U.S. Constitution demands for a president.
The historic hearing was the first time that a court has accepted arguments on the merits of the controversy over Obama’s status. His critics say he never met the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office, and the states and Congress failed in their obligations to make sure only a qualified president is inaugurated, while his supporters say he won the 2008 election and therefore was “vetted” by America.

 

 

The Hearing

Here blow by blow if you will is what happened in Atlanta, GA today (courtesy of many Facebook postings)

 

From Post Email (via Give Us Liberty)

 

The court convened at approximately 9:30 a.m.  Judge Michael Malihi began by asking those present to stand and reading the last paragraph of Atty. Michael Jablonski’s letterto Brian Kemp, Georgia Secretary of State, “into the record,” commenting that Jablonski was not present at the hearing.

The judge called plaintiff David Welden to stand and asked where he resided and if he were a registered voter in the state of Georgia.  Then his attorney, Van Irion, stood and stated that there were three types of citizenship in the United States.  He then provided argument on the definition of “natural born Citizen,” referring to Minor v. Happersett.
“The court should recognize that the term ‘citizen” is not ‘natural born Citizen,’ Irion said. “The Minor court’s definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ says ‘parents.’
“In closing, this case is about the Constitution,” Irion said. We’ve shown that Barack Obama’s father was never a citizen…and that means he is not constitutionally qualified…Finally, the defendant was ordered to be here, and I wish to state on the record that that shows not just a contempt for this court…”
Then Irion was interrupted and stopped speaking.
9:54 a.m.:  Atty. J. Mark Hatfield stood and stating that he represents Kevin Richard Powell and Carl Swensson. Hatfield mentioned the White House schedule as he saw that it related to Obama’s lack of attendance at the hearing.
Carl Swensson was sworn in at 9:56 a.m. and stated his residence and county.  Then Kevin Powell was asked the same.  Both were asked if they were able to vote for President of the United States. Swensson and Powell explained their challenges filed with the Secretary of State’s office to the judge. Hatfield held up the Certification of Nomination which Nancy Pelosi signed in 2008 to place Obama’s name on the ballot.  The judge asked if it was a “certified copy,” and Hatfield answered that it was.  He then read from it, stating that it did not affirm that the candidates met constitutional requirements to serve, while the wording from the Republican National Committee for its candidates did contain that wording.
The judge asked if the documents were from a “United States government source,” and Hatfield answered “Yes, sir, they were.”
Hatfield cited Jablonski’s January 25 letter “indicating that they did not want the proceedings to go forward and did not want to participate.”  Hatfield also entered into evidence Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father. Ken Allen, a resident of Arizona, stood to present the documentation he had received from the State Department after submitting a FOIA request early in 2009, which The Post & Email reported on here.  He stated that “Barack Obama Sr.” was “never a citizen.”
At 10:09 a.m. someone said, “Let’s take a short break,” and people stood up and began moving around and talking with one another.
At 10:17 a.m., the court was called back in to order.
Atty. Orly Taitz was called upon to speak.  The Georgia registered voter whom she represents, David Farrar, stood and identified himself. Taitz utilized a projector on the wall to the right of the judge as an aid in her presentation.  She then stated that evidence existed that Obama possessed Indonesian citizenship, to which the judge was heard by this writer to say, “That’s not relevant.”  Taitz then discussed the court’s decision in Minor v. Happersett and was interrupted by the judge, who said, “Counselor, can you save your argument for the closing?”  She then stopped speaking.
Mr. Christopher Strunk of New York then went up to the front of the courtroom to testify, and Taitz began to ask him questions about the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, one of which contains the name “Soebarkah.”  Strunk stated, “She wanted that expunged from her record, but we never got that.”
Susan Daniels, Private Investigator from Ohio, then took the stand, and spoke about her investigation which revealed that Obama had reportedly been using a social security number which she contended had not been assigned to him. Taitz asked Daniels, “What was the social security number attached to your request?” and Daniels read off “042-68-4425.”  Daniels said, “In all my years, I’ve never seen anything like this.”  She stated that the person who had originally owned the number had been born in 1890.
“First I ran the social security number to check the address, and the same number came up for him in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, DC.  It showed a phone number, and it was always the same number…It would show intermittently ‘August 4, 1961′ and ’1890.’”
Daniels stated that she obtained information “directly from the Social Security Administration.”

At 10:30 Mr. Chito Papa took the stand.  He stated that he works in the field of Information Technology including Adobe® software.
Taitz asked Papa if the “birth certificate” which “Obama posted online” had flattened layers.  ”Did you see one layer or multiple layers? Taitz asked.  ”I saw multiple layers,” he answered.
Taitz asked Papa about Obama’s social security number which appeared on his tax return posted on the internet, and Papa stated that the layers had not been flattened.  Taitz then thanked Papa for his testimony.
At 10:36 a.m. another witness, Linda Jordan, was called to the stand.  Taitz adjusted her Powerpoint presentation by means of a laptop computer and began by asking a question about “E-Verify,” the U.S. government’s system for flagging potential illegal immigrants from working.  Jordan stated that she ran Obama’s number through the E-Verify system and said, “When I read it, it was 2011, and it could not verify it.  It came back.”
At 10:39 a.m., Douglas Vogt took the stand.  Vogt stated that he owns a typesetting company and has been “in the business for 18 years now.”
Taitz asked Vogt if he examined the birth certificate which was posted online, and he said, “Yes, I did.”
He stated that “sloping lines” would not be seen if the image had been made from a paper document. Taitz asked, “Would you expect to see a clear embossed seal on the document?” and Vogt answered, “Yes, I would.”  However, he stated that such was not present on Obama’s birth certificate.  Regarding the number of Obama’s purported birth record, Vogt stated that “federal regs” require that “all birth certificate numbers have to be sequential, starting on January 1.”
At 10:49, witness John Sampson took the stand.  He stated that he has a background in criminal justice, served as a police officer in New York City and worked as an immigration inspector.  His background includes working for the INS in the area of “immigration fraud” and he was also a deportation officer.   He stated that he has testified in front of “federal grand juries.”  He stated that he started his own consulting firm in 2009 and has been self-employed since then. Taitz asked Sampson about Obama’s social security number, and Sampson said that he “ran” the number 042-68-4425 and that it was assigned to Obama since 1977. Taitz asked if Sampson had examined the birth certificate, and he said, “Yes.”  He raised the issue of the Nordyke twins’ birth certificate, whose numbers were lower than Obama’s even though their birth occurred a day later.  He stated that the registrar’s name was different than that on the Nordyke twins’ documents and that it was unlikely that the registrar would have been different in the “same hospital” regarding births one day apart.
Sampson recommended further investigation, including subpoenas and court orders, to obtain more information on the number “042-68-4425.” Sampson mentioned that Obama has also been known as “Barry Soetoro.”
Taitz asked what Sampson thought needed to be done regarding the questions about Obama’s background, and he recommended asking for an official copy of the SS-5 for his social security number application and the Hawaii Department of Health to see “if he was born in Hawaii.”  Sampson stated that an investigation would be “a criminal investigation” through a U.S. attorney’s office.  He said that if a person has been found to be impersonating a U.S. citizen, he would be subject to “deportation.”
Shortly thereafter, Sampson’s testimony ended, and Taitz began discussing Obama’s alleged years in Indonesia from 1968-71, during which he was known as “Barry Soetoro.”
“We have another boy who from 1968-69 was in Hawaii,” she said.  The judge then said, “Are you testifying?  Do you know how?” which brought laughter from the assembly. The judge then said she could discuss the matter during closing arguments.  Taitz responded, “I would like to testify,” after which she took the stand.
Taitz stated that “Mr. Obama has resigned from the bar.”  The judge asked, “How is that relevant?” Taitz said that it was pertinent because Obama was “hiding his identity.”