A story from Anthony

One of my Facebook pals Anthony Jordan, a Ron Paul supporter posted the following at his FB…


Her hair was up in a pony tail, Her favorite dress tied with a bow.

Today was Daddy’s Day at school, And she couldn’t wait to go.

But her mommy tried to tell her,

That she probably should stay home.

Why the kids might not understand,

If she went to school alone.

But she was not afraid;

She knew just what to say.

What to tell her classmates

Of why he wasn’t there today.

But still her mother worried,

For her to face this day alone.

And that was why once again,

She tried to keep her daughter home.

But the little girl went to school Eager to tell them all.

About a dad she never sees A dad who never calls.

There were daddies along the wall in back,

For everyone to meet.

Children squirming impatiently,

Anxious in their seats

One by one the teacher called

A student from the class.

To introduce their daddy,

As seconds slowly passed.

At last the teacher called her name,

Every child turned to stare.

Each of them was searching,

A man who wasn’t there.

‘Where’s her daddy at?’

She heard a boy call out.

‘She probably doesn’t have one,’

Another student dared to shout.

And from somewhere near the back,

She heard a daddy say,

‘Looks like another deadbeat dad,

Too busy to waste his day.’

The words did not offend her,

As she smiled up at her Mom.

And looked back at her teacher,

Who told her to go on.

And with hands behind her back,

Slowly she began to speak.

And out from the mouth of a child,

Came words incredibly unique.

‘My Daddy couldn’t be here,

Because he lives so far away.

But I know he wishes he could be,

Since this is such a special day.

And though you cannot meet him,

I wanted you to know.

All about my daddy,

And how much he loves me so.

He loved to tell me stories

He taught me to ride my bike.

He surprised me with pink roses,

And taught me to fly a kite.

We used to share fudge sundaes,

And ice cream in a cone.

And though you cannot see him.

I’m not standing here alone. ‘

Cause my daddy’s al ways with me,

Even though we are apart

I know because he told me,

He’ll forever be in my heart’

With that, her little hand reached up,

And lay across her chest.

Feeling her own heartbeat,

Beneath her favorite dress.

And from somewhere here in the crowd of dads,

Her mother stood in tears.

Proudly watching her daughter,

Who was wise beyond her years.

For she stood up for the love

Of a man not in her life.

Doing what was best for her,

Doing what was right.

And when she dropped her hand back down,

Staring straight into the crowd.

She finished with a voice so soft,

But its message clear and loud.

‘I love my daddy very much, he’s my shining star.

And if he could, he’d be here,

But heaven’s just too far.

You see he is a soldier

And died just this past year

When a roadside bomb hit his convoy

And taught all of us to fear.

But sometimes when I close my eyes,

It’s like he never went away.’

And then she closed her eyes,

And saw him there that day.

And to her mothers amazement,

She witnessed with surprise.

A room full of daddies and children,

All starting to close their eyes.

Who knows what they saw before them,

Who knows what they felt inside.

Perhaps for merely a second,

They saw him at her side.

‘I know you’re with me Daddy,’

To the silence she called out.

And what happened next made believers,

Of those once filled with doubt.

Not one in that room could explain it,

For each of their eyes had been closed. B

ut there on the desk beside her,

Was a fragrant long-stemmed rose.

And a child was blessed, if only for a moment,

By the love of her shining star.

And given the gift of believing,

That heaven is never too far.



The next President and VP of the US




Same for all you big gubmint neocons who love illegal wars.

Memo to Taxachusetts



Was turned to this article from Andy McCarthy of National Review by Mike Church (SIRIUS PATRIOT 125) in which Warren was given in no uncertain terms a smackdown by uptight Brit Stu Varney of FBN.


Want to make a cable-news Democratic party-strategist squirm? Ask her what she means by the “fair share” that must be paid by the rich. (No point further tarrying over what she means by “the rich,” since we already know they are billionaires and millionaires who jump about in corporate jets while somehow making only $200,000 a year.) In response to the “fair share” question, you will hear how Bush single-handedly destroyed the economy. You will hear about the diabolical Republican plan to desert the elderly, starve the young, and exploit everyone in between. You will hear a vague concession that “the rich” must be allowed to keep some semblance of their wealth — enough, at least, to keep them in the game of “paying it forward” to future generations of government wards. But what you won’t hear is a number.

This week, I had the pleasure of watching the Fox Business Channel’s Stuart Varney expertly press the Obama Left’s glib evaders on the subject. How much is a “fair share,” he doggedly inquired? A quarter? A third? Should the rich have to split their take 50-50 with Leviathan? Or is their success such a blight on social justice that the government (and the Teamsters, and the teachers’ unions, and the basket-case blue states) should get something much closer to all of it?

No answer. They cannot answer it.


They can’t answer it because all they will answer with is spin for the illegal alien usurper Obama and hatred for REAL conservatives like Ron Paul and Gary Johnson.  To these mega globalists fair share is EVERYTHING someone has to pay off the quadrillions of dollars in fake money derivatives to offshore private banksters led by the Zionist Rothschild Family.

More action taken on e-verify fail.

Birther Report is currently reporting the Failed E-verify Letter Sent To Barack Obama From Employer Linda Jordan

Meanwhile another letter has been sent to a county sheriff with orders in no uncertain terms to arrest the fraud.  A portion of this letter follows…


Mr. Robert M. Huston

Tazewell County Sheriff

101 S Capitol Street

Pekin, IL 61554


Dear Sheriff Huston,


If my facts are correct our local county Sheriff possess the most authority and power  within his respective county, even more powerful than the President of the U.S.  It is unfortunate however, in this instance the United States has been without a constitutionally qualified individual holding the highest office in the land for more than three years.  With this I refer to Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.  This is why I am and really this country is seeking the help of those who have the power, but most importantly the honor to make sure our laws are enforced, no matter who it may be that’s violating them.  This is why I have now taken the time to write you for the third time and provide you with further evidence of laws being broken by Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.  I do not take this lightly Sheriff Huston.  This is of great significance that I continue to petition you to uphold the law and start investigations on Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.  Not only was there election fraud committed towards the voting citizens of this Republic in 2008, our country is set up to do it all over again. “We the people” have the right to know that we are going to have constitutionally qualified and lawful elections.  Sir, the American people, those who believe in the U.S. States Constitution are not going to allow this to happen.  It is my responsibility to report to you that I have witnessed a crime being committed towards our country. Mr. Barack Hussein Obama produced a fraudulent document, alleged to be his birth certificate on 4-27-11.  I shared with you in my initial letter, evidence of that crime with a signed affidavit towards those facts and the laws violated.  I sent a follow up letter to inquire when you were going to do something about this.  I now share with you my third request.  It is your duty to protect the citizens of your county and this in turn sends a message to the entire country, no man is above the law.  In this request I will provide for you evidence of Social Security fraud being perpetrated by Mr. Barack Hussein Obama (if that is really legally his name).  There will be three signed affidavits regarding the evidence of Social Security fraud (one is an attorney’s).  I will also share with you Hawaii state law that allows you as a law enforcement officer to obtain an individual’s vital statistics.  This means you would be warranted to obtain Mr. Obama’s original typewritten long form birth certificate and then if such a document exists it needs to be independently forensically examined authenticated.


The question is will they listen?

The Dr. is in DC

Dr. Orly that is.  It seems as if she made a visit to no more than 12 of those idiots we call Congress.


I will write a full report a bit later. I flew red eye there, red eye back I have to be back at work today. To add to the hardship, I was diagnosed with a stress fracture in my foot and had to walk between 6 large buildings all day long in a lot of pain, ending up going bare foot between the meetings and carrying my shoes in my hands together with my purse and my brief case and dying of heat in my black lawyers suit. I forwarded my information on Social security fraud to 12 high ranking senators and congressmen and had personal in depth meetings with legal counsel, chiefs of staff and senior advisers for 4 high ranking senators and 3 representatives: Senator Tom Coburn-ranking member of the subcommittee on privacy on senate judicial committee, Senator Jim Inhofe, Senator Marco Rubio, Congressman Lamar Smith-chair f the House Judiciary committee, Congressman Alen West, Congressman Steven King.

I also forwarded my information to Senator Schumer, Senator Lieberman, Senator Feinstein, Senator Lautenberg, Senator Blumenthal. Unlike prior 7 , who are conservative Republicans, these 5 senators are Democrats, (Lieberman is a former Democrat, currently Independent) but might join the fight for other reasons.

Some of the chiefs of staff and legal counsel will work together in arranging for me to testify at one of the committee or subcommittee hearings. I should hear from them within a week. It is very important for you as constituency to write to Chair of Judiciary committee Lamar Smith and his legal counsel Holt Lackey and to the ranking member of the House subcommittee on privacy within Senate Judiciary committee Senator Tom Coburn and his chief of staff Michael Schwartz, thanking them for the meeting, for reading the pleadings and investigating the issue and urge them to invite me to the committee hearings to testify on the issue. Keep in mind, they have subpoena power, they can subpoena Judge Lamberth, Judge Puglisi, director of Health Loretta Fuddy, Registrar Onaka, Commissioner of Social Security Astrue and demand answers, whether high ranking officials can commit crimes and use privacy as an excuse, knowing that their appointees and inferior officials will be afraid to do independent investigation. Can 311 million US citizens lose their Constitutional right for redress of grievances and be forced to live under illegitimate regime of an individual occupying the White Hose based on a fraudulently obtained Social Security number and a computer generated forgery instead of a birth certificate, due to the fact, that officials and judges refuse to take on the issues and use privacy as an excuse?

After I landed I was on the air with Doug McIntire KABC and was able to provide millions of people with above information. I also mentioned on the air my interview to Univision in Spanish and the fact, that Hispanic population is extremely angry, that they have to go through e-verify, but Obama can sit in the position of the President with a failed e-verify. Republicans desperately need Republican vote and will lose this vote, if they or their high ranking officials, Like Senator Marco Rubio, Governor Martinez, Governor Sandoval do not raise this issue.


Dr. Orly, the late night radio program with the bigger audience is Coast to Coast with George Noory.  Might I suggest you give that a go.  And since Noory sometimes goes to L-A for the program, you get a chance to do the show live on air without the poor sound quality of cell phones.

The Foel

That’s the title of a 1969 episode of the classic TV show “Marcus Welby, M.D.”  I found while going around You Tube today.  In fact it was the second episode of the series.  In it, the good doctor known for his gentle bedside manner has to deal with a subject never talked about even in the 1960’s…Autism.  Look I should know…I was born in 1974 with borderline Asperger’s Syndrome, but I did not know about it until I was diagnosed at 21.  At 5 I was diagnosed with retardation after not wanting to do some tests doctors wanted to do on me after my mom found me reading the phone book.


Here is how the website TV Rage described the episode.


Dr. Welby finds that even a school that does brilliant work with retarded children will not accept 6-year old Paulie Stewart, since there is no basis for communication and response. his efforts to achieve a breakthrough result in hostile actions by Paulie, and a growing estrangement between the boy’s parents, Janice and Bob Stewart.

Paulie Stewart suffered from one of the many forms of autism spectrum disorder. The cause of this disorder is not known. (A study implicated thiomersol, a mercury-based preservative found in vaccines administered to children, but this has been debunked due to fraud on the part of the original investigator.) Autism is not characterized by any detectable structural brain abnormality. Patients with the disorder range from severe cases, who are all but “locked in” to relatively mild cases who can learn to function if they are careful to avoid certain stressors. Autism is characterized by difficulty in relating to other people; autistic patients do not seem to understand (or understand only with difficulty) the social cues most take for granted. There are indications that autistic patients do not process sensory data in the same way most people do. Some autistics, termed savants, are capable of remarkable feats within a very narrow range of skills. There is presently no cure, but intensive therapy often helps patients improve remarkably.
I think Dr. Sherry Tenpenny would disagree with the info in parenthesis.  But I wonder what she would think of the episode?  Anyway, here is The Foel originally aired on ABC on September 30th, 1969.

Annie Oakley comes out firing with a lot of guns

One of the few radio hosts I ever listen to on talk radio, terrestrial, satellite or web, who has ever covered for longer than a soundbite about Obama/Soetoro/Soeharkah’s qualifications is the woman dubbed “The Annie Oakley of the Airwaves”, Dr. Laurie Roth.

In her latest column she wonders…


Is it that members of Congress and the Senate don’t know where to go and what to do regarding the endless questions of Obama’s elegability?  Or,  is it that given what they already know,  they choose to put their traitorous heads in the ‘ratings’ and ‘international’ sand?  As it is now, with the constitutional and historical truth flying in our faces for at least 3 years,  Congress has revealed themselves as hopeless sell outs and traitors to the American people.Some in media see the alarm and breadth of this nightmare for America.


Dr. Laurie then mentions a column in Canada Free Press by Lawrence Sellin where in no uncertain terms he calls for the complete removal of Congress come next year.


He brilliantly points out the vivid and obvious truth of this constitutional breach.  The bottom line is that Obama was never elegible to be President because his father was Kenyan and a British subject.  He had dual citizenship and duel allegiance.


Later on in her column Dr. Roth mentions one of the first people who believe in this Republic, a man rather flippantly called by the Mockingbird corporate media The King of The Birthers.


Phil Berg,  Democrat attorney from Pennsylvania was one of the very first to sue Obama for elegability reasons.  He knew this was a constitutional disaster and crisis for the Democrat party, which he loved and had always been a member of.  Over the last 3 years,  Berg and several others have brought several dozen law suits against Obama trying to get to discovery to expose the fraud, cover ups and crisis.  Shockingly and disgracefully,  they have all been thrown out for lack of standing.  Apparently,  someone has gotten to much of the Judicial branch as well.


Dr. Laurie, you need to do a special three hour interview with Dr. Edwin Vieira, the man I call Dr. Constitution and he says standing is a stupid non-excuse, my words not his.


In disposing of the lawsuit Berg v. Obama, which squarely presents the question of Obama’s true citizenship, the presiding judge complained that Berg “would have us derail the democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted and who underwent excessive vetting during what was one of the most hotly contested presidential primary in living memory.” This is exceptionally thin hogwash. A proper judicial inquiry into Obama’s eligibility for “the Office of President” will not deny his supporters a “right” to vote for him—rather, it will determine whether they have any such “right” at all. For, just as Obama’s “right” to stand for election to “the Office of President” is contingent upon his being “a natural born Citizen,” so too are the “rights” of his partisans to vote for him contingent upon whether he is even eligible for that “Office.” If Obama is ineligible, then no one can claim any “right” to vote for him. Indeed, in that case every American who does vote has a constitutional duty to vote against him.

The judge in Berg v. Obama dismissed the case, not because Obama has actually proven that he is eligible for “the Office of President,” but instead because, simply as a voter, Berg supposedly lacks “standing” to challenge Obama’s eligibility:

regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. * ** [A] candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election.

This pronouncement does not rise to the level of hogwash.

BOLD…Like I said a stupid non-excuse.  The harm that has been done to this country by this clear and obvious usurper and by the media and congress sold a pile of ill goods from the global elite, mega bankers, and egomaniacs disguised as judges and soldiers, may be near irreverisble.

What are some of those consequences?

First, if Obama is not “a natural born Citizen” or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for “the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor Members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the Members of the House purport to “elect” Obama, he will be nothing but an usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because an usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.

Second, if Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President, he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the “Oath or Affirmation” will be a violation thereof! So, even if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the “Oath or Affirmation,” Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.

Third, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242, which provides that:

[w]hoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States * * * shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, * * *, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Plainly enough, every supposedly “official” act performed by an usurper in the President’s chair will be an act “under color of law” that necessarily and unavoidably “subjects [some] person * * * to the deprivation of [some] rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution * * * of the United States”—in the most general case, of the constitutional “right[ ]” to an eligible and duly elected individual serving as President, and the corresponding constitutional “immunit[y]” from subjection to an usurper pretending to be “the President.”

Fourth, if he turns out to be nothing but an usurper acting in the guise of “the President,” Obama will not constitutionally be the “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States” (see Article II, Section 2, Clause 1). Therefore, he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those forces. Indeed, for officers or men to follow any of his purported “orders” will constitute a serious breach of military discipline—and in extreme circumstances perhaps even “war crimes.” In addition, no one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch of the General Government will be required to put into effect any of Obama’s purported “proclamations,” “executive orders,” or “directives.”

Fifth, as nothing but an usurper (if he becomes one), Obama will have no conceivable authority “to make Treaties”, or to “nominate, and * * * appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not * * * otherwise provided for [in the Constitution]” (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). And therefore any “Treaties” or “nominat[ions], and * * * appoint[ments]” he purports to “make” will be void ab initio, no matter what the Senate does, because the Senate can neither authorize an usurper to take such actions in the first place, nor thereafter ratify them. One need not be a lawyer to foresee what further, perhaps irremediable, chaos must ensue if an usurper, even with “the Advice and Consent of the Senate”, unconstitutionally “appoint[s] * * * Judges of the Supreme Court” whose votes thereafter make up the majorities that wrongly decide critical “Cases” of constitutional law.

Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

Seventh, if Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him—with physical force, if he would not go along quietly—in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture. Obviously, this could possibly lead to armed conflicts within the General Government itself, or among the States and the people.

You read right, Congress cannot impeach him.  Even Devvy Kidd said so as she defends Dr. Vieira from the attacks of the Matrix.


For those who think Dr. Vieira Jr., Ph.D., J.D., is just some run-of-the-mill attorney, let me give you a very condensed bio: He holds four degrees from Harvard. For more than 30 years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States, he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson and Communications Workers of America v. Beck. His two volume tome, “Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution,” is the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective.

Obama seized the office of president through fraud. As a usurper, he’s never held office. That’s what the word usurp means: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right. Since he legally has never occupied the White House as president, he cannot be impeached.

Now, when I have pointed this out countless times to groups demanding impeachment, I get this response: I don’t care – we just have to get him out.

Those are people who proudly proclaim they only want to see the U.S. Constitution upheld. Those are people who state unequivocally that the usurper was never eligible to run because he’s not a natural born citizen under the U.S. Constitution.

You can’t have it both ways. In essence, what those folks are saying is we can do the same thing as Obama and his coconspirators: circumvent the Constitution.

But, the usurper has committed crimes while in office! Indeed, he has and continues to do so. Knowing he was not eligible to run, the putative president solicited campaign donations to the tune of about $700 million dollars. He can still be indicted for wire fraud.

Meanwhile, Dr. Roth wonders…Who will fight this critical battle if congress and our media won’t?
Well, aside from Berg and yes I would include Dr. Orly Taitz, there are the following websites
I no longer trust even Fox News when its resident blonde bimbo Megyn Kelly and lying Irish bloveator Bill O’Reilly blasted those who want the Constitution enforced.  Reason?  Two names…RUPERT MURDOCH AND PRINCE AL-WALEED BIN TALAAL.
It’s time for those two to be arrested along with all 535 members of Congress, the mega bankers, the corrupt Posse Comitatus violating non oathkeeping military and the media and have them tried in front of grand juries for the crimes of treason and conspiracy.  When convicted, it’s all over for them, for their tyranny and destruction of our sovereign republic.  My patience has been stretched to the limit with doing things the peaceful way going through the courts and makes me want to quote the warning from JFK…
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”
The latter kind of revolution is drawing ever so closer.  Be ready.


Just to further educate those of you who think Ron Paul hates the military…SEE THIS GREAT AD WHICH SHOULD AIR IN ALL 50 STATES!


The “Boone”doggle

Here is some more video of entertainment icon Pat Boone, ridiculed by the Mockingbird globalist press, taking on Soetoro’s suspicious Social Security Number.



And all this comes as the Globe tabloid is reporting there may be a SECOND investigation into the fake birth certificate.


President Obama is panicking over a secret police file loaded with evidence proving that his birth certificate – is a PHONY! Read all about what’s in the file, now in the hands of two police departments, and why it’s driving the fearful President to drink.


It is sad when a supermarket tabloid does what the Mockingbird Media fails to do…just ask John Edwards.

Dean Haskins big kahuna question for Hawaii’s biggest city



That is the big question the Birther Summit leader is asking of the despicably corrupt government that is not just Honolulu, but all of Hawaii, which came into being as the 50th state because we stuck our nose into the business of a sovereign nation.


Here’s how Dean describes matters


Last year, Barack Obama made what must be the most dubiously ironic statement in history: “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.” This, from a person whose entire life seems to be purposely hidden from even the most assiduous scrutiny; and, it appears to have been kept that way at great expense and vast assistance. At the heart of this clandestine artifice are two institutions in Honolulu that are purportedly part of the Obama nativity narrative; however, they both appear either unwilling or unable to corroborate the veracity of their inclusion in that story to any degree of comfortable certainty. A recent visit to both the Kapiolani Medical Center and the Department of Health in Honolulu revealed little more than the furtive mystery that has been characteristic of all things Obama.

In the middle of September, Miki Booth, George Peabody, and I visited both of those establishments hoping to glean any bit of information we could to provide answers for the myriad Americans who have sought the truth, but so far, have found little to none. Our first visit was to Kapiolani Medical Center, one of the two hospitals for which there have been claims made of being the birthplace of baby Barry (Queens Medical Center being the other). Our intention was to capture the visit on video, but we were informed that we could not do so inside the building.
We first visited the records office, where Miki completed and filed a form requesting the hospital records for her son’s birth. While there, an extemporaneous conversation occurred, simply because a clerk happened to question a co-worker about the “race” field on a document. The conversation is recounted here. After I had released that report, there were the expected comments from the truthaphobes, otherwise known as Obots, dissecting and doubting everything in it but the punctuation. There were subsequent statements made by Miki and George attesting to the facts presented, but facts are not the strong suit of those aforementioned creatures.
Allow me to digress for a moment. I recently witnessed Dr. Corsi, having obviously grown weary with the debased online comments made by a small group of Fogbow wannabes, uncharacteristically assail them verbally, and I must say, those brief diatribes were some of the most enjoyable comments I can remember ever reading. There is a Steven, a Cindy, and a couple Patricks who appear to do nothing else in life but sit at their computers and deride those of us with whom they disagree. As pitiful an existence as that must be, it can still be somewhat of an irritant to those of us who are daily targets of their mendacious manure. Nobody enjoys lies being told about them. One of the Patricks enjoys reading his deluded words so much that he copies and pastes many of his own comments to multiple websites, I suppose in a vainglorious attempt to receive some sort of praise for them. I’m no psychotherapist, but there appear to be some possible mommy issues involved.
Anyway, this Cindy critter reported that she had called someone at the Kapiolani Medical Center who first told her that, in that particular office, there would have only been one person working—a receptionist. Since that was a blatant lie, I reported the layout of the office here, recounting the multiple desks and employees who work in that office. Then, supposedly, the hospital official told her, “We have no comment on this topic, except to say it is not true.” Now, the official didn’t clarify what part of the “topic” she believed not to be true; was it that the conversation itself didn’t happen, or was it the content of the conversation?