Evil never takes off on the 4th

NEITHER DOES GOOD!  In this case, from Birther Report, Journalist Joe Kovacs rips the corporate fake left-right media over what this reporter calls the CT Connection in Birther-Gate, namely Obama’s phony Connecticut Social Security Number and of course the birth certificate.  Here Kovacs speaks to the one and only Peter Boyles of Denver’s KNUS Radio

Judge Nap has a reminder for all you Hillbots out there

And that goes for Hollywood too.  From his Facebook page. c/o The Washington Times

In the course of my work at Fox News, I am often asked by colleagues to review and explain documents and statutes. Recently, in conjunction with my colleagues Catherine Herridge, our chief intelligence correspondent, and Pamela Browne, our senior executive producer, I read the transcripts of an interview Browne did with a man named Marc Turi, and Herridge asked me to review emails to and from State Department and congressional officials during the years when Hillary Clinton was the secretary of state. What I saw has persuaded me beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty that Clinton provided material assistance to terrorists and lied to Congress in a venue where the law required her to be truthful.

Here is the backstory.

Turi is a lawfully licensed American arms dealer. In 2011, he applied to the Departments of State and Treasury for approvals to sell arms to the government of Qatar. Qatar is a small Middle Eastern country whose government is so entwined with the U.S. government that it almost always will do what American government officials ask of it.

In its efforts to keep arms from countries and groups that might harm Americans and American interests, Congress has authorized the Departments of State and Treasury to be arms gatekeepers. They can declare a country or group to be a terrorist organization, in which case selling or facilitating the sale of arms to them is a felony. They also can license dealers to sell.

Turi sold hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of arms to the government of Qatar, which then, at the request of American government officials, were sold, bartered or given to rebel groups in Libya and Syria. Some of the groups that received the arms were on the U.S. terror list. Thus, the same State and Treasury Departments that licensed the sales also prohibited them.

How could that be?

That’s where Clinton’s secret State Department and her secret war come in. Because Clinton used her husband’s computer server for all of her email traffic while she was the secretary of state, a violation of three federal laws, few in the State Department outside her inner circle knew what she was up to.

Now we know. She obtained permission from President Obama and consent from congressional leaders in both houses of Congress and in both parties to arm rebels in Syria and Libya in an effort to overthrow the governments of those countries.
Many of the rebels Clinton armed, using the weapons lawfully sold to Qatar by Turi and others, were terrorist groups who are our sworn enemies. There was no congressional declaration of war, no congressional vote, no congressional knowledge beyond fewer than a dozen members, and no federal statute that authorized this.

When Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., asked Clinton at a public hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Jan. 23, 2013, whether she knew about American arms shipped to the Middle East, to Turkey or to any other country, she denied any knowledge. It is unclear whether she was under oath at the time, but that is legally irrelevant. The obligation to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to Congress pertains to all witnesses who testify before congressional committees, whether an oath has been administered or not. (Just ask Roger Clemens, who was twice prosecuted for misleading Congress about the contents of his urine while not under oath. He was acquitted.)

Here is her relevant testimony.

Paul: My question is … is the U.S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons … buying, selling … anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey … out of Libya?

Clinton: To Turkey? … I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody’s ever raised that with me. I, I…

Paul: It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that they may have weapons … and what I’d like to know is … the (Benghazi) annex that was close by… Were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons … and were any of these weapons transferred to other countries … any countries, Turkey included?

Clinton: Senator, you will have to direct that question to the agency that ran the (Benghazi) annex. And I will see what information is available and … ahhhh…

Paul: You are saying you don’t know…

Clinton: I do not know. I don’t have any information on that.

At the time that Clinton denied knowledge of the arms shipments, she and her State Department political designee Andrew Shapiro had authorized thousands of shipments of billions of dollars’ worth of arms to U.S. enemies to fight her secret war. Among the casualties of her war were U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three colleagues, who were assassinated at the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, by rebels Clinton armed with American military hardware in violation of American law.

This secret war and the criminal behavior that animated it was the product of conspirators in the White House, the State Department, the Treasury Department, the Justice Department, the CIA and a tight-knit group of members of Congress. Their conspiracy has now unraveled. Where is the outrage among the balance of Congress?

Hillary Clinton lied to Congress, gave arms to terrorists and destroyed her emails. How much longer can she hide the truth? How much longer can her lawlessness go unchallenged and unprosecuted? Does she really think the American voters will overlook her criminal behavior and put her in the White House where she can pardon herself?

Your daily reminder of corruption in the media and government


It’s a long shot

From Devvy Kidd (via email)…”Republican Elites Are Lying To You… They Can Nullify The SCOTUS ‘Same-Sex Marriage’ Ruling Tomorrow” To me it’s about JUSTICE. And what happened at the court was judicial tyranny. But also let me say to the 5% of queer nation and your debauchery, you are not helping the cause of most gays one bit just like the black panthers do nothing for black people!

This from GrasstopsUSA:
Republican Leaders Are Lying To You. Congress CAN Nullify The Lawless Supreme Court Decree That Two Men Can Marry… And They Can Do It Tomorrow!
“This news might come as something of a shock to some of you, but Congress has the CLEAR and UNDENIABLE authority and power, under Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States, to NULLIFY the recent lawless decree by five unelected black-robed tyrants that elevates perversion to the status of marriage.
“All it takes is a simple majority vote in the House and the Senate and, once it is done, the courts have no power to rule on it and Barack Obama has no authority to veto it. If Congress votes… IT IS DONE.
A Tyrannical Supreme Court Is The Problem: The Checks And Balances Provided By The Constitution Is The Solution.
Now, some of you are already asking; if the solution to vacating this ruling is so simple, why isn’t Congress doing it right now? We’ll get to that, but first let’s talk about Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States.
Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States states: “he Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.” [Emphasis Ours]
And yes, stripping the Supreme Court of jurisdiction on cases has been done, otherwise attempted and affirmed on countless occasions:
” – After the Civil War, a newspaper publisher was jailed under the accusation of publishing “incendiary and libelous” articles and Congress moved in and stripped the Court’s jurisdiction to hear the matter. Nonetheless, the publisher asked the High Court to order his release and the Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY stated that it had no authority to hear the case.
” – Conservative icon Phyllis Schlafy points out: “When Chief Justice John Roberts was Special Assistant to the Attorney General during the Reagan Administration, he wrote a 27-page document defending the constitutional power of Congress to limit federal court jurisdiction.”
” – A former Supreme Court Justice, Owen Roberts, went so far as to push for a Constitutional Amendment that would limit Congress’ power under Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. It actually passed the United States Senate in 1953 but then died unceremoniously.
” – And back in 1981, Members of Congress proposed 22 bills seeking to remove the Supreme Court’s power to hear cases involving such issues as prayer in the schools and abortion. Unfortunately, the conservative revolution was just in its infancy and conservatives could not muster the votes in the Tip O’Neill-controlled House of Representatives to pass any of them.
“But now… Republicans control Congress. Getting the votes needed to execute Article III, Section 2 isn’t the problem. The problem is that patriotic Americans aren’t calling them on the carpet to do it and you can change that right here and right now.”
I have not heard whether or not, Hodges is going to ask for a rehearing on the case to the “Supreme” Court. The 25 days is running. I would and one of the things I would bring front and center:Ginsberg and Kagan should have been recused by Chief Justice Roberts because they officiated at “weddings’ for sexual deviants – an absolute no no. Second, it’s nothing more than a hallucination by Justice Kennedy that the 14th Amendment applies here to give sexual deviants the right to marry so they won’t be lonely. What hogwash.
LGBT activists: Marriage was never the ‘end game’ – Some admit they seek radical ‘transformation’ of society

Will this end the shrivled vagina’s run

In a just released batch of emails from the massive collection of Clinton communications being reviewed by the State Department, there is indeed classified information. Politico reports the big question regarding these materials is when they were labelled that way.

State Department spinster Marnie “barf” Harf said “It wasn’t classified at the time. The occurrence of a subsequent upgrade doesn’t mean that anyone did anything wrong.”


As Politico reports in covering State’s email dump: “The emails also provide a raw look into the grave danger that US Ambassador Chris Stevens faced — and the extent to which top State Department officials knew of his precarious situation from the time he arrived in Benghazi in the spring, in the midst Libya’s civil war.”

Stevens was one of the four Americans killed in the 9/11/2012 attack on the U.S. compound at Benghazi.

Another media outlet, The UK Daily Mail revealed other bits and pieces: “They also paint the onetime first lady and New York senator as technologically maladroit — she was all thumbs with an office fax machine — and distant enough from her husband Bill that their aides kept each informed about the other’s doings. She used her email to let aides know she was thirsy. ‘Pls call Sarah and ask her if she can get me some iced tea,’ one message read.”

Now as some people like to do some celebrating of Christmas in July, there is this tidbit

One of the mysteries raised in this dump concerns an unknown figure named “Santa” who was apparently on the then-secretary’s meeting schedule. The article notes of the “Santa” reference by Hillary: “‘I’m seeing Santa at 8:30,’ she wrote her deputy chief of staff (and secret lesbo lover) Huma Abedin six months after taking office, ‘so won’t take off until closer to 9:30.’”

South Carolina GOP Rep. Trey Gowdy, who leads the House Select Committee on Benghazi, has been trying to get all of Clinton’s Benghazi-related emails released. The ex-prosecutor has said he will schedule Hillary for a hearing before his committee when he is satisfied he has the necessary record of her communications on which to base his questioning.

The sooner, the better.



From Hagmann and Hagmann last night.  If you care enough to want to see judicial activism destroyed!


Just ask Devvy Kidd in her outrage.




From Rick Wells website

Lesbian activist Masha Gessen admitted the true homosexual marriage agenda in a panel discussion before a group of her like-minded comrades at a May 19, 2012 event. The gathering took place in conjunction with the Sydney Writer’s Festival, with her panel discussion titled, “Why Get Married When You Can Be Happy?”

She made the point that not only should homosexuals, in her view, have a right to marry, but they also have a right, and she has a mission, to eliminate marriage entirely. She stated, “It’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist.”

Liberals always love spreading their misery and dysfunction around. Lowering the bar of happiness for others raises them relatively. She quips that the existence of marriage causes “her brain some trouble.” It is quite evident in her subsequent comments that her brain is very troubled, and by more than just the existence of marriage.

And here is what this New World Order neophyte said via video.  Oh, and if you think ANY cable news channel will air this, including Faux News…THINK AGAIN!  TIME TO TAKE THE RED PILL!



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.